Offensive Jihad

Kebencian Muslim/Muhamad terhdp Kafir, Yahudi, Dhimmi & Jizyah, murtadin, pengritik. Lain2 : barang jarahan, pemaksaan masuk Islam, perintah2 pembunuhan oleh Muhamad, agresi pasukan Muslim dll
Post Reply
User avatar
Topsy KreeT
Posts: 2102
Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 8:32 pm
Location: Somewhere Far Away
Contact:

Offensive Jihad

Post by Topsy KreeT »

IslamOnline.net: "Offensive Jihad Is Permissible to Secure Islam's Borders, to Extend God's Religion, and...to Remove Every Religion but Islam from the Arabian Peninsula"


IslamOnline.net is listed as the 6th most popular Islamic website in the world. And yet, Western apologists of Islam assure us that the overwhelming majority of Muslims are peaceful, and that Islam rejects offensive jihad. (See Original Arabic here.)

  • Fighting Against Non-Muslims -- Legitimacy and Rulings


    islamonline.net, 8 Jan 2011

    Q: When is it permissible to fight against non-Muslims, and when is it not permissible? Please elaborate.

    Mufti: Dr. 'Imad Mustafa, Professor of Fiqh and Its Origins, at the Universities of al-Azhar and Umm al-Qary

    In the name of God, praise be to God, and prayers and peace be upon the prophet of God, etc.:

    Fighting against non-Muslims is what is known in Islamic jurisprudence as Jihad in the path of God. Jihad is a prescribed duty in cases of aggression from the infidels against Muslims, for we must resist them, make jihad against them, and defend against them. This is according to the text of the Qur'an, ]for Almighty God has said: "Fight in the way of Allah those who fight you but do not transgress. Indeed. Allah does not like transgressors" (Qur'an 2:190). This type of jihad is known as defensive jihad, and it is a duty agreed to by all Islamic scholars and all who are wise, and is endorsed in our day by recognized international charters. However, the occupier and his associates have come to label this "terrorism."

    Then there is another type of fighting against the non-Muslims known as offensive jihad. Islamic scholars have differed on the issue of offensive jihad, which is to pursue the infidels into their own land without any aggression or assistance to him. Some scholars have gone as far to say that this jihad is illegitimate, while others have gone as far as to say that it is legitimate and even required.

    However there can be no disagreement that offensive jihad is not totally prohibited, for two schools [of Islamic jurisprudence] have ruled that offensive jihad is permissible in order to secure Islam's border, to extend God's religion to people in cases where the governments do not allow it, such as the Pharaoh did with the children of Israel, and to remove every religion but Islam from the Arabian peninsula, and to save the captive and weak. [...]
ari jambronk
Posts: 152
Joined: Fri Mar 25, 2011 10:11 am

Re: Offensive Jihad

Post by ari jambronk »

Topsy KreeT wrote:Jihad is a prescribed duty in cases of aggression from the infidels against Muslims, for we must resist them, make jihad against them, and defend against them. This is according to the text of the Qur'an, ]for Almighty God has said: "Fight in the way of Allah those who fight you but do not transgress. Indeed. Allah does not like transgressors" (Qur'an 2:190).
Apa yang anda pertentangkan Jihad melawan agresi...?
Topsy KreeT wrote:However there can be no disagreement that offensive jihad is not totally prohibited, for two schools [of Islamic jurisprudence] have ruled that offensive jihad is permissible in order to secure Islam's border, to extend God's religion to people in cases where the governments do not allow it, such as the Pharaoh did with the children of Israel, and to remove every religion but Islam from the Arabian peninsula, and to save the captive and weak. [...]

Tidak seprti dugaan Ali sina yang mengatakan jihad offensif tanpa motif hanya untuk mencari harta rampasan perang dan terbukti Ali Sina SALAH
User avatar
Topsy KreeT
Posts: 2102
Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 8:32 pm
Location: Somewhere Far Away
Contact:

Re: Offensive Jihad

Post by Topsy KreeT »

:stun:
Apa anda mau membenarkan bahwa jihad menyerang kafir diperbolehkan untuk menyebarkan agama?
jadi
Posts: 551
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2011 2:02 pm

Re: Offensive Jihad

Post by jadi »

Topsy KreeT wrote:Apa anda mau membenarkan bahwa jihad menyerang kafir diperbolehkan untuk menyebarkan agama?
baca sejarah lagi dong...
kebanyakan perang di kekhalifahan islam itu lebih bermotif politik untuk memperluas wilayah sama seperti Inggris berperang melawan perancis dll. di antara negara2 islam juga terjadi perang perluasan wilayah. kalau itu memang Ego penguasanya saja. sebutkan satu perang yang bermotif penyebaran agama oleh Islam. Intinya orang islam berperang semata2 karena melihat kaum kafir dan harus diislamkan kalau ga mau masuk islam maka akan dibunuh, (Sya kasih contoh ketika charlemagne melakukan perluasan ke bavaria orang pagan yang ga mau pindah agama ******* dibunuh atau diusir) hingga di daerah tersebut hanya tinggal muslim saja yang hidupo dan tidak ada agama lain boleh hidup
User avatar
Topsy KreeT
Posts: 2102
Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 8:32 pm
Location: Somewhere Far Away
Contact:

Re: Offensive Jihad

Post by Topsy KreeT »

Komentar geblek, thread ini tidak membahas sejarah tapi FATWA TERKINI TENTANG JIHAD!
jadi
Posts: 551
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2011 2:02 pm

Re: Offensive Jihad

Post by jadi »

Fatwa ulama Al Qaeda ya....! :-&
User avatar
Topsy KreeT
Posts: 2102
Joined: Tue Sep 22, 2009 8:32 pm
Location: Somewhere Far Away
Contact:

Re: Offensive Jihad

Post by Topsy KreeT »

jadi wrote:Fatwa ulama Al Qaeda ya....! :-&
Baca dulu sebelum berkomentar!
Itu Fatwa dari Islamonline.net, Salah satu situs islam terbesar dan terfavorit sejagad internet.
Kalau ente tak suka fatwanya protes langsung ke sumbernya. :green:
User avatar
Kibou
Posts: 1359
Joined: Mon Nov 03, 2008 11:30 am
Location: Land of the free

Re: Offensive Jihad

Post by Kibou »

However there can be no disagreement that offensive jihad is not totally prohibited, for two schools [of Islamic jurisprudence] have ruled that offensive jihad is permissible in order to secure Islam's border, to extend God's religion to people in cases where the governments do not allow it...
Kalau membaca pernyataan Mufti di atas, menimbulkan kesan bahwa dalam fiqh ada ijma yang menyatakan bahwa jihad ofensif itu statusnya Makruh atau Mubah. Makruh maksudnya boleh dilakukan tapi tidak dianjurkan, Mubah maksudnya boleh dilakukan, tidak ada pahala maupun kutuk bagi yang melakukan ataupun tidak melakukan.

Kenyataannya, sudah tercapai ijma' (konsensus) para mujtahid islam mengenai jihad agresif di 3 generasi awal muslim. Jadi adalah taqqiya (bohong demi islam) bahwa jihad agresif itu masih diperdebatkan statusnya.

Jihad agresif dalam islam hukumnya adalah WAJIB / FARD KIFAYAH.

Untuk lebih jelasnya silakan pelajari di:

"Status Jihad Dalam Fiqh"
viewtopic.php?f=88&t=55708
Post Reply