Islam tidak Disebar Dengan Pedang

Hal2 yang menyebabkan terjadinya teror dalam Islam dan kaitannya dengan Jihad.
Post Reply
kuta bali
Posts: 2187
Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 3:55 am

Islam tidak Disebar Dengan Pedang

Post by kuta bali »

Dari murtadin bari dari India: ... sword.html

“Islam was not spread by the sword,” I’ve been hearing these words since forever. “Islam is the religion of peace, when people were introduced to Islam, they felt like Divine Knowledge had been revealed to them, like Allah had chosen them and readily accepted Islam.”
History states quite the opposite. History records years of Muslims invasions and oppression, murder rape, loot and barbarian rampages. True, history is full of such incidents and such behavior is not confined to Muslim invaders, but Muslims do have a specialty of covering their bloody past and projecting themselves as the peace loving, friendly and just lot that they are. No, not a single life was taken when they were bringing Islam out of their little cocoon in the Middle East. It was all song and dance, everyone accepted Islam just like that, no questions asked, no one beheaded. Sounds fishy to me…
Perhaps the followers of the Religion of Peace are oblivious of Mahmud of Ghazni, the most prominent ruler of the Ghaznavid dynasty, with his iconoclastic plundering and destruction of Hindu temples, all in the name of jihad. Mahmud’s invasion is described as one in which he “put thousands of Hindus to the sword” and made a pastime of "raising pyramids of the skulls of the Hindus".

Or perhaps they even choose to ignore Firuz Shah Tughlaq, another star in the bloody history of the Religion or Peace. Under his rule, the Hindus, the infidels were forced to pay Jizya tax and if the infidels dared to build temples, to practice their religion in their homeland, they were executed. But the most heinous act by this slave of Allah was execution of Brahmans who refused to convert to the one and only true religion. A disturbing account of one such incident is found in the "Tarikh-i-Firuz Shah" is a historical record written during his reign that attests to the systematic persecution of Hindus under his rule:
An order was accordingly given to the Brahman and was brought before Sultan. The true faith was declared to the Brahman and the right course pointed out. But he refused to accept it. A pile was risen on which the Kaffir with his hands and legs tied was thrown into and the wooden tablet on the top. The pile was lit at two places his head and his feet. The fire first reached him in the feet and drew from him a cry and then fire completely enveloped him. Behold Sultan for his strict adherence to law and rectitude.

As gruesome as Firuz Shah’s atrocities were, they were no match for Timur’s, or Tamerlane, as he is known in the West. Timur’s exploits are best described in his own words, found in his memoir, Tuzk-i-Timuri. In them, he vividly describes the massacre at Delhi:
In a short space of time all the people in the [Delhi] fort were put to the sword, and in the course of one hour the heads of 10,000 infidels were cut off. The sword of Islam was washed in the blood of the infidels, and all the goods and effects, the treasure and the grain which for many a long year had been stored in the fort became the spoil of my soldiers. They set fire to the houses and reduced them to ashes, and they razed the buildings and the fort to the ground....All these infidel Hindus were slain, their women and children, and their property and goods became the spoil of the victors. I proclaimed throughout the camp that every man who had infidel prisoners should put them to death, and whoever neglected to do so should himself be executed and his property given to the informer. When this order became known to the ghazis of Islam, they drew their swords and put their prisoners to death.

One hundred thousand infidels, impious idolaters, were on that day slain. Maulana Nasiruddin Umar, a counselor and man of learning, who, in all his life, had never killed a sparrow, now, in execution of my order, slew with his sword fifteen idolatrous Hindus, who were his captives....on the great day of battle these 100,000 prisoners could not be left with the baggage, and that it would be entirely opposed to the rules of war to set these idolaters and enemies of Islam at other course remained but that of making them all food for the sword.

I could go on about the ransack and destruction of various Hindu temples during Aurangzeb’s reign, in place of which he constructed mosques. Or about Tipu Sultan, the bigoted ruler, who forced conversions of Hindus and Christians under his jurisdiction. There was also the Nizam of Hyderabad, who called the Hindus in his state traitors, treated them like second class citizens and even persecuted 1,50,000 Hindus during the period of India’s Independence, in order to declare Hyderabad a complete Islamic state.

The atrocities of the slaves of Allah in the Indian subcontinent might as well be the most disturbing and gruesome of their barbaric plundering, but their brutality in the Persian Empire was nothing less. In an attempt to establish Allah’s rule in Persia, to bring the true religion to the fire worshipping infidels, the Arabs conquered Persia in the mid 7th century and their deeds there are nothing but monstrous. The Arabs set out to destroy Zoroastrianism and establish Islam as the official religion of the state. The Zoroastrians were given the state of dhimmis and were subjected to persecutions, harassment and discrimination that began in the form of sparse violence and forced conversions. Failure to pay Jizya tax resulted in imprisonment or persecution. Zoroastrian slaves captured in war were only given freedom if they converted to Islam. Fire temples were destroyed and mosques were built in their place. Laws were imposed restricting the social and political participation of Zoroastrians, with the intention that they would be forced to convert to Islam. Many Zoroastrians converted to Islam to escape from this torture the Muslims inflicted upon them in their own homeland. Over time, the persecution of Zoroastrians was increasing and the number of believers was steadily declining. An Iranian scholar commented, “Why so many had to die or suffer? Because one side was determined to impose his religion upon the other who could not understand."
In later years, Zoroastrians were subjected to public humiliation, when the Muslims declared them najis (impure) unfit to live with and hence forced them to evacuate cities, restricting them from the fields of society, education and work.

The Battle of Ullais was followed by what could be called the most gruesome depiction of the Muslim conquests in Persia. Khalid ibn al-Walid vowed in his prayer to Allah: “O Lord! If You give us victory, I shall see that no enemy warrior is left alive until their river runs with their blood!"
And so he did. After the war, Khalid ibn al-Walid ordered all the prisoners of war to be decapitated. In the river Khaseef the blood was still not flowing, as Khalid had pledged, until on the advice of Qa'qa ibn Amr one of the commanders of the Muslim army, Khalid ordered the dam on the river to be opened. The river then flowed with blood, and it became known as the River of Blood. When the city of Estakhr in the south, a Zoroastrian religious center, put up stiff resistance against the Arab invaders, 40,000 residents were slaughtered or hanged. An instance of religious oppression is recorded when an Arab governor appointed a commissioner to supervise the destruction of fire temples throughout Iran, regardless of treaty obligations. One of the Umayyad Caliphs was quoted saying, "milk the Persians and once their milk dries, suck their blood".
The Muslims mercilessly continued to torture the Persians, so much that some of them fled to India and the rest were forced to convert to Islam gradually. There is much that hasn’t been covered in the history of the Religion of Peace’s mission to bring the ‘light of Islam’ to their Asian brothers and all of it is equally barbaric and repulsive. The Abbasids (who probably were the worst oppressors of all times), The Ummayads, The Safarids, The Samanids, all destructed the rich land of Persia, in the name of Allah. There were repeated periods of forced conversions by The Samavids and those who refused, it is said that rivers ran red with their blood. During the Qajar dynasty, traveler A.V.W. Jackson noted that Zoroastrians lived in constant fear of persecution by Muslim extremists and their lives were in danger whenever the fanatical spirit of Islam broke out. The humiliation they faced went to such an extent that they were not allowed to step out during the rainy season, because the water that touched their bodies and fell on the ground would pollute the Muslims. Arab Jizya collectors would mock Zoroastrians for wearing Kusthi and would rip it off, hanging the cord around the necks of the beleaguered faithful.
I cannot talk enough about the plight of the Zoroastrians under the Muslims and the horrors they had to face. These are the deeds of the slaves of Allah, the god who claims to be The Most Merciful, whose religion is that of peace of brotherhood. And they say Islam was not spread by the sword…
Coming to the modern world, we have Muslims crying about how the Jews are torturing the Palestinians, how the Americans are killing their brethren in Iraq and Afghanistan, how the whole world is conspiring against them, planning the destruction of the innocent followers of Allah’s true religion. What we don’t hear them crying about is how their fellow Muslims are killing both, non Muslims AND Muslims in so many parts of the world.
Yes, there are Palestinians who suffer every day; yes, a lot of Iraqis and Afghans are in fact victimized by America, I don’t deny that. I feel for them, for their children who are in misery. But I also feel for the Copts in Egypt. You won’t hear a Muslim raising his voice against the discrimination of Copts in Egypt, how their religious freedom is hampered, how converts from Islam to Christianity are brutally murdered. No, you won’t hear them talk about how Christian girls in Egypt are kidnapped and forced to convert to Islam, how they are raped and forced to marry Muslim men.
The Muslims do not care about Sudan, where 1.5 million Christians have been persecuted by the Janjaweed, the Arab Muslim militia, and even suspected Islamists in northern Sudan since 1984. It is a violation to religious freedom when France bans the Burka, but it somehow isn’t an issue when Saudi Arabia imposes the same on every woman, Muslim or not, prevents public practice of any religion but Islam, where converts from Islam are executed. No, that’s completely alright.
The Indonesian Muslim extremists continue to demand imposition of Sharia and have burned estimated 600 churches till date. The Iranian Government persecutes converts to Christianity from Islam.
Muslims love to rant about how America and Israel are on a mission to destroy their ummah, conveniently ignoring the age old Shia Sunni wars, where both groups, especially in Afghanistan are on a rampage to wipe out each other. Suicide bombings in hospitals, weddings, offices streets are so common. The Shias are known for torturing to death or summarily" executing "hundreds" of Sunnis "every month in Baghdad alone," many arrested at random. Persecutions of the Ahmaddiya sect, clashes between the Chinese Muslims and Uyghurs, violence against Alawites in Syria, persecution of Takfiris, Ajlaf and Azral Muslims, all of this by Muslims themselves.
Do these people even deserve to be so much as associated with the word peace? Where do the moderates go, when the Muslims shed blood in so many parts of the world? What happens to their voices then? Do they have no compassion for those victimized by Muslims? Why is there no hue and cry every time a Christian child is killed in Egypt by the Muslims? Or when Muslim children themselves are targeted by these self proclaimed peaceful bandits?

Your thoughts. Thanks :)
Posts: 3862
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2009 2:31 am

Re: Islam tidak Diserbar Dengan Pedang

Post by 1234567890 »

islam is a religion of peace !!!!

yang suka berontak ... nuntut ini itu dan ngerusuh dan meledak itu ... PASTINYA ANTEK2X YAHUDI DAN CIA DAN USA !!!!!

Posts: 22
Joined: Sun Jun 19, 2011 9:31 am

Re: Islam tidak Diserbar Dengan Pedang

Post by otakcabul »

kalau menurut anak nya pentolan Hamas memang begitu bang , mau kafir atau muslim , intinya yang menghalangi sikat bang :shock:

User avatar
Posts: 301
Joined: Wed Aug 17, 2011 12:04 am

Re: Islam tidak Diserbar Dengan Pedang

Post by drinz »


emange arek cilik sik SD di kandani ilsam menyebar dengan damai.....mpretttttttttttttttttttttttttttttt
User avatar
Posts: 208
Joined: Sun Jul 31, 2011 3:23 am
Location: Bumi Damai

Re: Islam tidak Diserbar Dengan Pedang

Post by Voodo »

Agama damai dan penuh toleransi :vom: :finga:
Hanya muslim-muslim yg buta nurani yg mengamini "damai" ini :vom:
Posts: 166
Joined: Sat Jun 18, 2011 4:52 pm

Re: Islam tidak Diserbar Dengan Pedang

Post by ekapuri »

Membaca tulisan dari murtadin India di atas mengingatkan saya kepada perjalanan wisata ke beberapa kota di India utara. Saya heran waktu itu, kenapa kebanyakan candi yang ada hanya kecil dan relatif baru, yang paling tua yang saya lihat hanya sedikit lebih dari 100 tahun saja umurnya, bandingkan dengan candi Borobudur dan Prambanan yang umurnya lebih dari 1000 tahun.

Mungkinkah candi-candi hindu yang sebelumnya ada di India utara dihancurkan oleh penguasa muslim, seperti yang terjadi di Afghanistan ketika Taliban berkuasa? Atau mungkin seperti budaya Persia yang dihancurkan oleh penguasa islam? Atau mungkin seperti halnya budaya Arab sebelum islam yang total dimusnahkan oleh Muhammad dan pengikutnya?

Ketika berpikir demikian, semakin khawatir rasanya melihat Indonesia yang semakin islami. Khawatir melihat saudara-saudara sebangsa dan setanah air yang masih terjajah tapi tidak menyadari.
Post Reply